My analogy was crude, and those are ugly, ugly words (words I do not use incidentally).

What I was trying to say was that while the teacher did not break any laws, would we be giving them 'credit' for enlightening the children if they enlightened them with ugly words or ugly stereotypes? Probably not. But those words are legal and the topic would 'make kids think' and be seen as fair game. So why is the one okay and the one not? Just because of the passion of the teacher?

The teacher needed to think through this a bit more before just doing. That's all I'm trying to say.

Jax.